Petrol Stations With the Best Petrol Quality

The question of whether Kenyans are being scammed regarding petrol quality has sparked significant debate, particularly following a viral video titled “Testing Petrol Quality in Kenya” by Kim JH of Tanuki Garage. The video raised concerns about the consistency and quality of premium fuels, especially Shell V-Power, compared to regular fuels. Below is an analysis of the situation;

Key Findings from the Viral Video

1. Discrepancies in Octane Ratings:
   • The video revealed that Shell V-Power, marketed as a premium fuel with a Research Octane Number (RON) of 95, underperformed in some tests. For example:
     • Shell Limuru Road: V-Power scored 87 RON, while regular fuel at the same station rated 91 RON.
     • Shell Lavington: V-Power scored 87 RON, compared to regular fuel’s 90 RON3912.
   • In contrast, Total Limuru Road recorded the highest octane rating at 92 RON for regular petrol, outperforming Shell V-Power39.
   • Astrol Petroleum – Astrol imports fuel in bulk and subjects it to rigorous testing upon arrival in Kenya, ensuring compliance with Kenyan standards. This commitment to quality was highlighted in a recent viral video by Kim JH of Tanuki Garage, where Astrol’s fuel recorded a Pump Octane Number (PON) of 91, outperforming Shell V-Power at some locations
2. Public Outrage:
   • Motorists expressed frustration, as they pay a premium for Shell V-Power but do not always receive the advertised higher octane performance. Many feel misled, questioning the value of premium fuels3914.

Responses from Stakeholders

1. Vivo Energy Kenya (Shell Distributor):
   • Vivo Energy Kenya defended its fuel quality, stating that Shell V-Power adheres to RON 95 standards and undergoes rigorous testing at depots. They launched an independent investigation to verify the claims and promised updates91015.
   • A follow-up video by Vivo Energy showed a test at their Lavington station, where Shell V-Power scored 96.6 RON. However, this sparked further skepticism, with Kenyans questioning the transparency of the process14.
2. Regulatory Bodies (KEBS and EPRA):
   • KEBS and EPRA conducted confirmatory tests on fuel samples from various stations, including those mentioned in the video. They reported that all sampled fuels met the required RON ratings, including premium fuels like Shell V-Power168.
   • The agencies cautioned against using unverified testing gadgets, emphasizing that accurate RON ratings can only be determined in controlled laboratory settings1813.

Public Concerns and Skepticism

1. Testing Methods:
   • Many Kenyans questioned the reliability of both the viral video’s testing methods and Vivo Energy’s follow-up tests. Critics argued that independent, transparent testing involving third parties is necessary to restore public trust14.
2. Premium Fuel Value:
   • The controversy has led to broader discussions about whether premium fuels like Shell V-Power deliver on their promises. Some motorists reported no noticeable performance benefits, despite the higher cost3914.

Conclusion

While regulatory bodies and Vivo Energy Kenya have defended the quality of fuel in the market, the discrepancies highlighted in the viral video and the public’s skepticism suggest a need for greater transparency and independent verification. The ongoing investigations and public outcry underscore the importance of ensuring that consumers receive the quality they pay for, especially when it comes to premium products like Shell V-Power.

For further details, you can refer to the original sources, such as the viral video and statements from KEBS, EPRA, and Vivo Energy Kenya

'Want to send us a story? Submit to NAIROBIminiBLOGGERS via our Email [email protected]'